NEC Article 625 EV Charging

EV Charging Amps by Vehicle

How many amps your car pulls on Level 2 is set by its onboard charger, not by the wall unit. Here is what the popular EVs accept, how fast that charges, and the one rule that decides your wire size.

Quick answer: The car's onboard charger is the ceiling, so a bigger wall unit will not charge a 32A car any faster. Intry publishes an onboard rating only where it holds the manufacturer's own specification document, and the biggest surprise there is the 2025 F-150 Lightning: 48A retail, not 80A. You size the wire to the charger, never the car.

The Onboard Charger Is the Ceiling

Every EV has an onboard charger that converts the AC from your wall unit into DC for the battery, and its rating caps how many amps the car will draw no matter how big the wall charger is. Plug a 32A-max car into a 48A charger and it still pulls 32A. That is why the circuit is always sized to the EVSE (the charger) at 125% of its output (NEC 625.41, 625.42), not to the car: the car merely decides how much of that circuit it uses. The practical move is to match the charger to your car's onboard rating, or go one step higher to future-proof, then wire the circuit to the charger.


Charging Speed by Vehicle Tier

Charger tiers, the circuit each one needs, and the charge speed this calculator computes for the vehicles Intry holds a document for
Charger ratingPowerRange/hour, our sourced carsCharger CircuitTypical vehicles (unverified by Intry)
32A7.7 kW15.6 to 26.3 mi/hr40ATesla Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive, Toyota bZ4X (FWD), Subaru Solterra, many base trims and PHEVs
48A11.5 kW21.4 to 37.3 mi/hr60ATesla Model 3 Long Range / Performance, Model Y / S / X, Ford Mustang Mach-E, Hyundai Ioniq 5 / 6, VW ID.4, Chevy Bolt (2022+), Honda Prologue
80A19.2 kW21.4 to 37.3 mi/hr100AGMC Hummer EV (2024+), Chevy Silverado EV, Lucid Air

The Range/Hour column is computed by this page's own calculator across the vehicles Intry holds an EPA consumption record for, so it moves when that list moves and it is not a number anybody typed. Efficiency is what spreads it: those vehicles run 2.03 to 3.42 miles per kWh, not the 3-to-4 figure this page used to print, because a full-size electric truck is not a compact hatchback. The 80A row equals the 48A row at the top end because no vehicle in Intry's sourced roster accepts more than 48A. The circuit column is the charger sized at 125% to a standard breaker: 32A to a 40A circuit, 48A to 60A, 80A to 100A. Onboard ratings can differ between trims and model years, so confirm your own.


The Vehicles Intry Holds a Spec Sheet For

Every figure in this table came out of a manufacturer or US government document that Intry holds a copy of, and each row names the document it came from. It is a short list on purpose: a vehicle is here only when a primary source states its rating, and an unsourced trim is left out rather than estimated.

Onboard AC charger rating as the manufacturer prints it, and the charge speed this calculator computes for that vehicle on a 48A charger at 240V
VehicleOnboard, as printedOn a 48A chargerSource
2025 Ford F-150 Lightning, 98 kWh Standard-Range Battery11.3 kW/10.5 kW (48A)23.3 mi/hrFord Motor Company, 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning Technical Specifications
2025 Ford F-150 Lightning, 123 kWh Extended-Range Battery11.3 kW/10.5 kW (48A)24.5 mi/hrFord Motor Company, 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning Technical Specifications
2025 Ford F-150 Lightning, 131 kWh Extended-Range Battery11.3kW/10.5kW / 19.2/17.6kW (Fleet only option)4Fleet configuration only, not available for retail sale. Fleet sales require an eligible FIN, see a fleet sales specialist for details.24 mi/hrFord Motor Company, 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning Technical Specifications
2025 Nissan LEAF, S (40 kWh)6.6 kW onboard charger21.7 mi/hrNissan North America, 2025 Nissan LEAF Brochure
2025 Nissan LEAF, SV PLUS (60 kWh)6.6 kW onboard charger21.4 mi/hrNissan North America, 2025 Nissan LEAF Brochure
2025 Kia EV6, Light Standard Range (RWD, 63.0 kWh)10.9 kW37.3 mi/hrKia America, 2025 Kia EV6 Specifications
2025 Kia EV6, Light Long Range (RWD, 84.0 kWh)10.9 kWKia prints the same 10.9 kW onboard charger for all five 2025 EV6 trims (Light Standard Range, Light Long Range, Wind, GT-Line, GT). EPA holds ONE record for the 84 kWh RWD trims, so this record's consumption figure covers Light Long Range, Wind and GT-Line in RWD, which Kia prints at the same 319 mi and 114 MPGe.36.8 mi/hrKia America, 2025 Kia EV6 Specifications

Intry holds a fetched manufacturer or EPA document for every vehicle in the sourced table, and publishes their figures from it. It separately holds the manufacturer's own charging documents for Tesla and Rivian, and any of their rows in the tier table further up this page are typed by hand from them rather than derived in code, so only a hand check keeps them in step. Every other vehicle named in the tier table is widely reported at that rating and Intry has NOT verified it against a manufacturer document: treat those as a starting point and confirm your own trim and model year against the manufacturer's specification sheet before you buy a charger or pull a circuit.

There is no Tesla in that table, and not because Intry could not find the rating. Tesla publishes: Model S / Model X / Model Y / Model 3 Performance / Model 3 Long Range: 11.5 kW (48 amp), 60 amp circuit breaker. Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive: 7.7 kW (32 amp), 40 amp circuit breaker. Intry holds that document (read 2026-08-22). Tesla states no model year and no battery capacity on that page. Every roster record is keyed to a model year, because an onboard rating that is right for one year is wrong for another, and an unsourced field is dropped here rather than estimated. Rivian publishes: The onboard charger is capable of providing 11.5 kW of charging power to the battery of the R1T and the R1S. Intry holds that document (read 2026-08-24). Rivian states no model year on that page, and every roster record is keyed to one. It also states the figure as power delivered to the battery, which is the charger's output rather than the alternating-current input a branch circuit sees, and this roster will not convert one into the other by assuming an efficiency.

Separately, Intry attempted GM (Silverado EV, Blazer EV, Equinox EV) and holds no manufacturer specification document giving an onboard charger rating for them. Those vehicles can still be chosen from the EPA list, where the figures EPA itself publishes are shown and no rating is taken from the car. That is a limit of what Intry holds, not a statement about those cars.


The 2025 F-150 Lightning Is 48A Retail, Not 80A

This page used to say the Extended Range battery accepts 80A on a 100A circuit. Ford Motor Company prints the onboard charger for the retail Extended-Range battery as "11.3 kW/10.5 kW (48A)", so 48 A, not 80 A. A retail 2025 Lightning on an 80 A charger still draws 48 A, so the 100 A circuit buys that truck nothing.

Ford does print a 19.2 kW option, and only against the largest battery. Ford's footnote on it reads: "Fleet configuration only, not available for retail sale. Fleet sales require an eligible FIN, see a fleet sales specialist for details."

Intry's reading of that row, which is not Ford's wording: Ford prints that 19.2/17.6 kW option only against this battery, and the retail figure is the 48 A one. Ford prints no ampere figure in this battery's onboard-charger cell at all: the 48 A is carried from the same column's "48A Connected Charge Station 15-100% - 13 hours" and "1 hour, 80A Ford Charge Station Pro - 20 miles at 48A/30 miles at 80A" rows.

Ford Motor Company, 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning Technical Specifications, read 2026-08-22.


What the manufacturer documents actually say about the onboard charger

The car's onboard charger sets how fast it can take alternating current, so it is worth knowing before paying for a bigger circuit. Finding it in writing is harder than it sounds. Intry went looking for it in manufacturers' own documents, archived what came back, and this is what those documents said.

Of the 21 manufacturer documents Intry has examined for an onboard alternating-current charger rating, 10 printed one and 10 did not, with 1 stating a figure Intry could not confirm off a render. That is a count of documents Intry reached, not a survey of the industry: it says nothing about a manufacturer whose documents are not in this list, and a document that carries no rating is not evidence that the manufacturer publishes none anywhere. It is also not everything Intry holds: Tesla's own onboard-charger table sits outside this count, is not keyed to a model year, and carries a figure.

The examined documents that printed no onboard alternating-current rating span Acura, Cadillac, Chevrolet, Ford, GM, Rivian, Subaru, Toyota, Volvo. Ford and Toyota appear in both lists, on different documents, so the absence is a property of the document rather than of the manufacturer.

The 10 documents that printed a rating

Manufacturer documents carrying a labelled onboard alternating-current charger rating. The figure itself is published only on the vehicle records it belongs to.
MakeSubjectWhat the document shows
HyundaiIONIQ 5, 2025The specification sheet prints a labelled "On-Board Charger (OBC) / Max Capacity (kW)" row, scoped to All Models.
HyundaiIONIQ 6, 2025The same labelled "Max Capacity (kW)" row, scoped to All Models.
GenesisGV60, 2025The same labelled row, in one merged cell spanning RWD, AWD, Advanced AWD and Performance AWD.
GenesisGV60, 2026The same labelled row and the same merged scope, one model year later.
KiaEV6, 2025An "On-board charger (OBC)" row on the specifications page, the same value in every trim column.
KiaEV9, 2025The same labelled row on the same page shape.
KiaNiro EV, 2025The same labelled row on the same page shape.
FordF-150 Lightning, 2025The technical specifications print BOTH sides of the charger on one row, an input and an output, which is why Intry's roster records which side a figure describes. The higher fleet option is footnoted as fleet configuration only and not available for retail sale.
ToyotabZ, 2026The figure appears in press release prose rather than in a specification table, which is a weaker document shape than a labelled row.
NissanLEAF, 2025A brochure figure Intry already held at a recorded hash, from an earlier sourcing sprint. A document already held does not need a second acquisition.

The 10 documents that did not

Real documents, fetched and archived, carrying no onboard alternating-current rating in what was served. A silent document is not evidence that the manufacturer publishes none.
MakeSubjectWhat the document shows
FordMustang Mach-E, 2025Ford's own technical specification sheet carries DC fast-charge capability and no onboard AC rating anywhere in the document. This is the sharpest row in the table: the same manufacturer prints both sides of the charger for the Lightning and neither for the Mach-E.
SubaruSolterra, 2025No onboard rating. The sheet prints a Level 2 charge time at "240V@32a", which is the supply the test was run at and not a declared vehicle ceiling. Reading it as a ceiling would publish a rating for a car whose charger is smaller, which is why a charge-time row is never transcribed as a rating here.
ToyotabZ4X, 2025A real specifications page, fetched and archived, with no onboard AC rating in what was served.
CadillacLyriq, 2025A real specifications page, fetched and archived, with no onboard AC rating in what was served.
ChevroletSilverado EV, 2025A real specifications page, fetched and archived, with no onboard AC rating in what was served.
GMSilverado EV newsroom release, 2025A real newsroom page, fetched and archived, with no onboard AC rating in what was served.
AcuraZDX, 2024A real release page, fetched and archived, with no onboard AC rating in what was served.
VolvoXC40, 2025A real specifications page, fetched and archived, with no onboard AC rating in what was served.
VolvoEX40, 2025A real specifications page, fetched and archived, with no onboard AC rating in what was served.
RivianR1T and R1S onboard charger support articleThe article states a figure, and states it as power delivered to the battery, which is the charger's OUTPUT rather than the alternating-current INPUT a branch circuit sees. Examined for an AC rating, this document carries none, and Intry will not convert one into the other by assuming an efficiency.

Nissan Ariya, 2025. Nissan's press kit does state a figure, but it sits inside a collapsed panel and no rendered confirmation of it could be taken, so Intry does not publish it. It is neither a rating Intry can stand behind nor an absence Intry can claim, which is why it is counted as its own outcome.

Why Intry does not work the figure out from EPA data instead

EPA publishes a vehicle's energy consumption and its Level 2 charge time, and those two figures together imply an onboard alternating-current power. Intry can compute that for any vehicle whose EPA record carries both figures, and does not publish it as a rating, because it was measured against every manufacturer figure Intry holds and it misses: the signed error runs from -31.6% to +34.3% across 41 rows, and it lands on the right rung of the standard charger ladder 12 times out of 41. A single correction cannot fix it either: the per-make average error runs from -13.5% to +4.8%, so correcting the makes that read low would break the makes that read high. Intry publishes an onboard rating only where it holds the manufacturer's own document, and shows EPA's published figures as EPA's.

Signed error of the EPA-derived onboard power against the manufacturer's own figure, over 41 EPA rows joined to 10 manufacturer documents that carry a figure, across 6 makes. A rung is one of the onboard ratings manufacturers actually build to, and the derivation hits the right rung when it rounds to the one the manufacturer printed. These are errors, not ratings.
MakeRowsError rangeAverageRight rung
Kia10-31.6% to +2.5%-13.5%5 of 10
Nissan2-14.1% to -10.1%-12.1%2 of 2
Ford5-11.9% to +34.3%-0.3%1 of 5
Hyundai10-9.8% to +8.8%+3.0%2 of 10
Toyota6-9.0% to -7.5%-8.3%0 of 6
Genesis8-6.3% to +14.4%+4.8%2 of 8

Across all 41 rows the median miss is 8 percent, 11 rows land within 5 percent and 29 within 10 percent, and the derivation picks the correct rung of the standard charger ladder 12 times out of 41, which is 29 percent. Size the circuit to the charger you are installing, which is what NEC 625.41 and 625.42 require in any case, and treat the car as the thing that decides how fast it fills.


Size the Circuit for Your Charger

Pick the charger amperage that matches your car's onboard rating and get the exact wire, breaker, GFCI, and whether your panel has room.

Loading calculator...

Frequently Asked Questions

How many amps does an EV charge at on Level 2?

It depends on the car's onboard charger, which is the ceiling for AC (Level 2) charging: a 32A-max car plugged into a 48A charger still draws 32A. Intry publishes an onboard rating only where it holds the manufacturer's own document stating it. Those are: 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning, 98 kWh Standard-Range Battery, 48A; 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning, 123 kWh Extended-Range Battery, 48A; 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning, 131 kWh Extended-Range Battery, 48A (carried from another row of the same document, not printed in the onboard-charger cell); 2025 Nissan LEAF, S (40 kWh), 6.6 kW; 2025 Nissan LEAF, SV PLUS (60 kWh), 6.6 kW; 2025 Kia EV6, Light Standard Range (RWD, 63.0 kWh), 10.9 kW; 2025 Kia EV6, Light Long Range (RWD, 84.0 kWh), 10.9 kW. Other vehicles are widely reported at 32A, 48A or higher, and Intry has not verified those figures against a manufacturer document, so confirm your own trim and model year on the specification sheet before you buy a charger or pull a circuit.

Does a bigger charger make my car charge faster?

Only up to your car's onboard charger limit. The onboard charger is the ceiling: if your car accepts 32A, plugging into a 48A charger still charges at 32A, not 48A. A larger charger only helps if the car can accept more. This is why you match the charger to the car's onboard rating, then size the circuit to the charger. Buying a 48A charger for a 32A-max car does no harm and future-proofs for your next EV, but it will not speed up the current one.

How do I size the wire for my EV, by the car or the charger?

By the charger, always. The wire and breaker are sized to the EVSE (the charger) at 125% of its output, never to the car (NEC 625.41, 625.42). The car only decides how many amps it will draw from that charger. So the workflow is: check your car's onboard AC charger maximum, pick a charger at or above it, then size the circuit to the charger. A 48A charger gets a 60A circuit with #6 copper whether the car draws the full 48A or only 32A.

How fast does an EV charge at 48 amps?

A 48A / 240V charger delivers 11.5 kW, and how many miles per hour that adds depends entirely on the car. Across the vehicles Intry holds an EPA consumption record for, a 48A charger adds 21.4 to 37.3 mi/hr, a 32A charger adds 15.6 to 26.3 mi/hr, and an 80A charger adds 21.4 to 37.3 mi/hr. The 80A and 48A figures are identical, at both ends, because no vehicle in Intry's sourced roster accepts more than 48A, so an 80A charger adds nothing for any of them. With no vehicle named, Intry falls back to a site-wide average of 290 Wh per mile, which has no manufacturer or EPA document behind it and gives about 39.7 mi/hr at 48A. Every vehicle Intry holds a record for sits below that figure, because the average is not derived from any of them.

What amperage does a Tesla or F-150 Lightning charge at?

Ford Motor Company prints the onboard charger for the retail Extended-Range battery as "11.3 kW/10.5 kW (48A)", so 48 A, not 80 A. A retail 2025 Lightning on an 80 A charger still draws 48 A, so the 100 A circuit buys that truck nothing. Ford Motor Company, 2025 Ford F-150 Lightning Technical Specifications, read 2026-08-22. Ford does print a 19.2 kW option, but only against the largest battery and only for fleet configurations, not for retail sale. Ford's own wording is quoted in full on the page. Tesla publishes an onboard charger table on its own support site and Intry holds it, read 2026-08-22: Model S, Model X, Model Y, Model 3 Performance and Model 3 Long Range are 11.5 kW (48 amp) on a 60 amp circuit breaker, and the Model 3 Rear-Wheel Drive is 7.7 kW (32 amp) on a 40 amp circuit breaker. Tesla states no model year on that page and no battery capacity, which is why no Tesla appears in the sourced table above: every record there is keyed to a model year, because a rating that is right for one year is wrong for another. The wire is sized to the charger either way (NEC 625.41, 625.42).


Related EV References